September 21, 2004
Here, he discusses the malpractice at CBS:
These are not people who were duped. And the problem is not how they handled it once they were caught -- though they handled that part badly. Their main transgression was in ignoring the evidence staring them in the face before the story ever ran. At the very least, they could have given some time on the broadcast to the dissenters.But they didn't. And I've said this before, but it bears repeating: don't fool yourself believing that this is the first time this has happened. Come on. If you have watched "60 Minutes" then you are familiar with that feeling you have at the end of a segment, when you think to yourself: "Wow, everything seems to point to one conclusion." You thought that was because everything really did point to one conclusion?
Nope. It's because everything else was left on the cutting room floor.
We're just seeing one very notorious example where they got caught.
Yeah. They've got caught before, but there wasn't enough "buzz" that they were forced to kind-of sort-of admit it.
It's a whole new world out there.
Posted by: Attila at
02:22 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 211 words, total size 1 kb.
207 queries taking 0.1619 seconds, 456 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








