April 04, 2007

Nancy Pelosi's Scarf.

It all hinges on whether she was in a house of worship, which I can't tell from the photo.

If she was, it was totally legitimate to cover her head, just as a gentile man would if he went to a temple.

Out in the public square, it becomes more dicey.

Though there are certainly parts of the world where I would wear a skirt if local customs demanded it, even though I happen to think that the right pair of slacks is even more modest.

The issue is not how the Speaker attired. It is whether her going to Syria was appropriate in the first place.

UPDATE: Yup. The pic was in a mosque. Talk about your misplaced outrage: get a grip, folks; it's a piece of fabric.

James Joyner, BTW, gets it right: she was within her rights to go on the trip, but that doesn't mean it was a smart stunt to pull.

She made it clear that the U.S. government doesn't speak with one voice when it comes to hostile states. But don't question her patriotism!

Posted by: Attila Girl at 02:12 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 186 words, total size 1 kb.

1 My objection is that a woman like Nancy Pelosi, obsessed with her looks, would allow herself to be seen in public sporting the most unflattering headgear known to woman.

Posted by: Sissy Willis at April 05, 2007 05:15 AM (Q6JEL)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
24kb generated in CPU 0.0257, elapsed 0.1572 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.1479 seconds, 458 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.