March 15, 2008

Okay. I Don't Get It.

The new MacBook has two gigs of memory. Never mind that I remember when a single meg was a big deal—and for disk space, not memory. What I want to know is why the new machine is slower than my husband's PowerBook, with its own two gigs of RAM. It even underperforms my own old PB, with its 512 megs or whatever (that is, when the thing wasn't crashing every five minutes; but it could bring up Gmail consistently, and it didn't get upset when I had more than two windows open).

My great-great-grandfather, bringing people along the Oregon Trail to the West Coast, used to counsel them that laptops were never s reliable as desktop machines, and that they were hard on one's posture. He said that the handiness of being able to call up the Internet while at the reins of the covered wagon was far offset by having to do extra T'ai Chi to bring one's spine back into alignment.

Right again, old man.

Posted by: Attila Girl at 05:25 PM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 177 words, total size 1 kb.

1 It's the video card.

Posted by: BillyHW at March 15, 2008 06:37 PM (FhMJq)

2 I don't know much about Macs, but I run 4 gigs at work to handle my massive AutoCAD Civil 3D files. In a PC, 2 GB is more than plenty for ordinary tasks such as e-mail, office suite, etc. Shoulda bought a PC.

Posted by: Desert Cat at March 15, 2008 08:05 PM (DIr0W)

3 Your top 15 posts are all in italics. Got an open tag somewhere?

Posted by: Desert Cat at March 15, 2008 08:07 PM (DIr0W)

4 Does this mean that you own a MacBook Air and it's that slow? It shouldn't be. The one I tried out in the Apple store was pretty fast. Most owners I've heard from rave about theirs. I'd take it to the Genius Bar and ask them. D

Posted by: David H Dennis at March 17, 2008 05:44 AM (aRHYm)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
24kb generated in CPU 0.0173, elapsed 0.1496 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.1405 seconds, 461 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.