November 25, 2005

Over at Pillage Idiot,

Cousin Attila points out that the definition of "abstinence" may be changing.

Posted by: Attila Girl at 12:18 PM | Comments (5) | Add Comment
Post contains 20 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Will wonders never cease?

Posted by: Desert Cat at November 25, 2005 06:06 PM (xdX36)

2 I think it's briliant. They might have finally found a definition of abstinence that teenagers can actually follow. Me, I'm more inclined to the "oral sex isn't really sex" version.

Posted by: Christophe at November 25, 2005 06:55 PM (2rBIo)

3 Hm. I don't know so much about the male experience, but I think I would have been better off waiting just a bit longer. The one thing I will insist on, however, is that "lack of birth control" not be the reason for abstaining. In other words, I'm likely to be the kind of mom who says "take a condom just in case." Of course, I have a cousin who's the product of a bad marriage that came about after he was conceived.

Posted by: Attila Girl at November 25, 2005 07:44 PM (JZqY7)

4 Personally, I don't think that people are emotionally ready to have sex until their early 30s. (Don't tell my customers, though.) But, yes, I'm with you that it is better to offer esteem-based rather than fear-based reasons not to have sex, because (as I clearly recall) teenagers are really not very good at putting behavior and consequences together.

Posted by: Christophe at November 25, 2005 09:08 PM (2rBIo)

5 Particularly when the consequence is something that could only happen to someone else, like pregnancy.

Posted by: Attila Girl at November 25, 2005 11:53 PM (JZqY7)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
24kb generated in CPU 0.0201, elapsed 0.1695 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.1602 seconds, 462 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.