June 12, 2007

The Case for DDT

Sam Zaramba, the Director General of Health Services for the Republic of Uganda, explains why the West must support effective anti-malarial programs in his country, and in all of Africa:

Although Uganda's National Environmental Management Authority has approved DDT for malaria control, Western environmentalists continue to undermine our efforts and discourage G-8 governments from supporting us. The EU has acknowledged our right to use DDT, but some consumer and agricultural groups repeat myths and lies about the chemical. They should instead help us use it strictly to control malaria.

Environmental leaders must join the 21st century, acknowledge the mistakes [Rachel] Carson made, and balance the hypothetical risks of DDT with the real and devastating consequences of malaria. Uganda has demonstrated that, with the proper support, we can conduct model indoor spraying programs and ensure that money is spent wisely, chemicals are handled properly, our program responds promptly to changing conditions, and malaria is brought under control.

Africa is determined to rise above the contemporary colonialism that keeps us impoverished. We expect strong leadership in G-8 countries to stop paying lip service to African self-determination and start supporting solutions that are already working.

Via Insty.

Posted by: Attila Girl at 09:33 AM | Comments (1) | Add Comment
Post contains 201 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Presumably, these "environmentalists" are the same ones who've already written that they want to see the Earth's human population reduced to about one billion (or less)? So, isn't there some sort of cognitive malfunction on the part of anyone who expects them to take action to save lives? -Bob

Posted by: Bob at June 12, 2007 01:42 PM (CP6tB)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
24kb generated in CPU 0.0499, elapsed 0.1698 seconds.
209 queries taking 0.1608 seconds, 458 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.