I was out this evening, so I watched the debate on tape.

I'd say Cheney made it clear that you can win a thing like this without losing your composure or lowering yourself to the other guy's level.

Kerry and Edwards are coming across as guys who have no better ideas than to attack everything the President does. And Edwards was painfully scripted tonight, repeating the same phrases over and over. When Cheney needed to underscore a point, he generally found fresh ways to express his most important ideas. (With the exception of his verbal tick, "the fact of the matter is." If Cheney were ever again to be in a public debate, that would be the drinking phrase.)

Note that on several occasions Cheney declined to use up all the seconds allotted to him, and on a few he "threw away" entire half minutes. He was selective about what he resonded to, and was entirely willing to wade out of the mud, as when he said his piece about gay marriage, heard that Edwards' rebuttal included an allusion to his own daughter—and when the spotlight came back to him simply thanked the senator "for his kind words about my family." This was an intensely classy way to avoid defending the one area where I suspect there is a policy disagreement with the course the administration has taken, and where there really wasn't anything left for him to say.

I was also struck by the fact that he listened closely to the instructions for the question about what they each brought to the table as potential VPs. He shared biographical material while also confessing his discomfort in talking about himself. He talked about why his working relationship with the President was so good, and what made it effective. And when it was Edwards' turn he couldn't even remember that he wasn't supposed to say his running mate's name, and shared nearly nothing about his own background. It was as if the prefabricated script had taken over, and the man himself had simply left the stage.

I'm hearing "first half to Cheney, second half to Edwards." The people who say that are grading on an age-adjusted curve. This one was Cheney's, in large part because people are not voting for a litigator: they want a Chief Executive. Someone who doesn't just poke holes in others' records, but gets things done.

Finally, the VP went on the attack early on when he felt he had to. Offered another opportunity to kick the senator in the teeth, he didn't do it. Another example of restraint.

I don't want to send anyone into a tizzy here, but I'm thinking of voting Bush-Cheney this November. Leaning that way.

Update: Joyner has his own analysis, plus a roundup-by-trackback.

Posted by: Attila at 01:08 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 470 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Cheney blew one big time!!! In telling Edwards to check his facts he referred him to Factcheck.COM which is an anti-Bush site. George Soros must be thrilled!

Cheney meant to say Factcheck.ORG but don't expect an admission of fault from Cheney. Maybe he did mean Soros's site - Freudian slip sort of thing.

Posted by: littlemrmahatma at October 06, 2004 10:01 AM (BZ0tI)

2 Could have sword he said ".net," but then I know the URL and might have just heard what I expected to hear. No need to ask you which one you go to more often

Posted by: Attila Girl at October 06, 2004 12:34 PM (SuJa4)

3 He didn't say NET, though you obviously frequent that site for your facts. The URL is mentioned in the transcripts which you can find on the Web. Yep, Cheney was right on the money on that one.

Posted by: littlemrmahatma at October 06, 2004 01:23 PM (BZ0tI)

4 Wow. "Sword" for "sworn." How did I even manage to do that? (The n key is nowhere near the d key.)

Posted by: Attila Girl at October 11, 2004 04:46 AM (SuJa4)

Hide Comments | Add Comment